Assume Equal Responsibility In Raising Children Children And Young People Essay

Assume Equal Responsibility In Raising Children Children And Young People Essay Naturally, family is made up of mother, father, and children. Children are supposed to be raised by both parents, and we all accept that father and mother have vital roles in upbringing their children into potential and useful people to contribute to social development. However, it is quite challenging if we want to compare whether mother or father is more important. What if mother is more important, is she has to assume more responsibility, or what if father is, ought he to assume more? On my point of view, in no account should parents assume unequal responsibility due to children development sake, the difficulty of raising children, and family happiness. Whether or not children are nurtured with equal responsibility from mother and father has effect on childrens development throughout their lives. With both cares, children get full experience of live from both mother and father because what father can give to children is different from that of the mother, but it doesnt mean one is less important than the other. Mother can teach children how to cook, how to sew, or how to deal with household chore while father can teach them how to fish, to be strong, or to protect oneself from any danger. And some circumstances children need advice from father and other circumstances, only mother is more suitable to give advice. On top of that it is also known that with both parents care, children benefit in their braveness. Children will feel confident around the house, at school, or elsewhere because they think they are equal to other, and they have both parents supporting them. Oppositely, if one side fails to care their children, it means that ha lf of knowledge is leak sine rarely can either a mother or father completely function as both roles. Not only does their knowledge is affected, but also children are more likely to have gone to wrong path as Peiitea in his article had quoted You need both eyes to see the clear path. Without one, it becomes blurry and you may be sidetracked from the path and may not be able to find your way again (peiitea, 2011). Imagine when a child who is fatherless or motherless walking on the street and sees other children with their mother and father, how would they feel? It would upset the children, and improper behavior will occur as the result of this upset feeling. The National Fatherhood Initiative, U.S. Bureau of Census for the FBI researched and gathered statistics related to children who were raised in a household without a father. Individuals who were father deprived make up 72% of all teenager murderers. 60% of the rapists in society also did not have an active father figure in their life. 70% of young people who are incarcerated today suffer from father  deprivation as well. Children who lack a father growing up are twice as likely to quit school and eleven times more likely to have violent behavior. Three out of four teenage suicides also have the common factor of an absentee father. 80% of adolescents in psychiatric hospitals do not have a father figure in their lives as well as 90% of all run-aways (Watergrl76, 2012). Moreover children also face confidence leaking problem with the absence of one side. Biologically, father is the one who give his daughter emotion confident, protection, and affection. According to an article online, women without fathers tend to have low self-confidence around men. They are weak and hide what their boundaries are (Paul, 2008). In all, It is precise that children without or less care from father do ruin their lives. The absence or unequal responsibility may upset their development. Secondly, raising children is not easy task. When they were babies, from milk, food, cloth, cleaning, learning to walk, or sleep is all stressful. They are twenty four hours needed to be taken care of. What if the baby gets sick, not only money that you have to pay but also the nervousness you encounter. As they grow up and go to school, more thing parents need to concern whether they study well, make friend with gangster, play school truant, or eat something unhealthy. Furthermore, every children is different, using old way to teach children will not work to your own children. You need more time to observe them and choose the best way. In an article I read online, mentions taking care children is extremely hard, and wrong way of teaching children is frustrating for you as well as the child. Raising the child alone is even tougher. (TOSSER, 2009). Mother or father alone cant handle those stresses. Remember besides your children who need care, you yourself also need to rest. You need a partner who can give encouragement and warm. Nevertheless, with both parents share responsibility, thing is solved. Last but not least, that both parent share equal responsibility increases family happiness. The more time you are with each other, the more understanding you have for each other. Everyone in the family feel close and warm. It brings peaceful environment to children as well the whole family. In an online article also proves that when both parents have a collaboration and fantastic agreement in adopting children, family makes less argument (Both Parents should Assume Equal Responsibility in Raising Children , 2011). In contrast, without one side care, both the children and the member family feel they are neglected. Children feel they dont receive love from father, and mother feel father dont willing to help her. Nothing is worse than parent care only working and dont have time for family. My counterpart might say that parents cant share equal responsibility because father is busier at work to own for the living. He doesnt have time to take care of their children. Mother needs to be responsible for it. This argument has some merit on the surface. Remember marriage is not all our sharing task to do, but love. Work at house, taking care of the baby and household, is much more stressful then the job outside. In addition, everyone is busy; it is just the matter of how you manage your time, and what if mother unfortunately passes away, who will take care of our children? How could you support to take care of them when you and they are almost stranger? If father dont have time for his children, it will reduce the family happiness. To sum up, because of the interest of childrens development, the stress of raising children, and the family satisfaction, sharing equal responsibility is a must. Every parent should take this into consideration because children are weak and innocent they need both cares and support to help them accept new thing, learn the social value, and meet with the social expectation.

An Analysis of My Personality Type

Your main points and each step are clear but you did not label them correctly. Good observations, points and outcomes documented throughout the paper. Conclusions/Summary References/Citations (4) Good job/ Citations throughout each section Spelling/Grammar Good job/ Be sure to use active voice page Count/l_MIT (4) 20 PAP Format/Errors See PAP comments throughout the paper Overall Comments: Very Good paper! This paper has demonstrated that you understand the core objectives and learning outcomes for this assignment and the meaning of your personal assessment.Remember that graduate level writing is a continuous improvement process. A solid best practice is writing a paper and then putting it down and reading it when you are fresh. You will often pick up small mistakes by doing this. Fix some of the little mistakes found in this paper and you will strengthen your work on future assignments. It is evident you paid attention to getting your paper right†¦ You are doing graduate level writing. Enjoyed reading your work †¦ Great job! This paper discusses my personal results of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator personality test and the Jung Typology Test.It also details how analyzing and understanding personality types is relevant to organizational behavior. The first section of this paper details and discusses the specific aspects of my personality based on the tests mentioned above. Each specific personality preference is analyzed and validated based on my type and temperament. Examples from my personal and professional life are utilized during the validation. The second section off this paper addresses what have learned about the Myers-Briggs and Jung Typology personality tests and how this knowledge can be used by an employee, co-worker, and manager of an organization .Seem,'rods: personality, type, organizational behavior Richard Nixon once said, â€Å"Don't try to take on a new personality; it doesn't work† (â€Å"Quotes on Personality', 2014). Bel ieve that this is excellent advice. Instead of trying to develop a new personality, perhaps people should learn to better understand the personality that they have. After taking the Myers- Briggs Type Indicator personality test and the Jung Typology Test, I have a better understanding of my own personality and also the personality traits of other people around me.In the first section of this paper I will detail and discuss the specific aspects of my personality based on the tests mentioned above. In the second section of this paper I will explain how what I learned about personality types relates to organizational behavior and how it will help me be a better employee, co-worker, and manager. Aspects of My Personality Type After taking both the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator personality test and the Jung Typology Test, I was classified with the Introverted Sensing Thinking Judging (1ST J) personality type.SITS personality types are considered quiet reserved people who are loyal, faithfu l, and dependable (â€Å"Psychological Type†, 2014). They tend to express a strong sense of duty and commitment and are recently very serious individuals (â€Å"Jung Typology Test†, 2014). Gist's believe in laws and traditions and they are generally conservative in nature (Kroger, Teethes, & Rutledge, 2002). In the following paragraphs will discuss the validity of the different letters of my personality type and how they specifically relate to me.Introvert Preference On the Jung Typology Test, I scored a distinct preference of 67% introversion over extroversion. As an introvert, I tend to focus within myself for satisfaction. Frequently I have to force myself to interact with people in a social setting. I rarely enjoy hanging out in large groups of people. I prefer to spend time alone and would consider myself a â€Å"home body'. When I do go out, it is usually to a place where I don't have to interact with people on a personal level.Sitting in a dark movie theatre wi th my family or eating dinner at a restaurant are perfect examples of a low threat social setting. Throughout my life I have always had 1 or 2 deep friendships as opposed to a large group of friends. An occasional weakness with introverts is they are sometimes reel octant to work with others (Kroger, Teethes, & Rutledge, 2002). In my professional life, I am not quite as introverted. As a military member and manager of people, I have to interact with my subordinates and peers on a daily basis in order to facilitate mission accomplishment.Sensing Preference With a sensing presence of 62%, according to the Jung Typology Test, I seem to conform to approximately 70% of the U. S. Population regarding this preference (Kroger, Teethes, & Rutledge, 2002). Sensors are defined as individuals that prefer to get their information in a literal way from their 5 senses as opposed to getting information in a figurative way like an intuitive arson would (â€Å"Psychological Type†, 2014). In bo th my personal and professional life prefer to deal in facts and live by a set of rules. As a 25 year military veteran, have been conditioned to respond and react exactly this way.I tend to rely on my experiences to help me analyze the specifics as they are presented to me. A major weakness with my preference for sensing is that sometimes refuse to look at things from another perspective. Thinking In this measured area of the Jung Typology Test, I demonstrated a clear propensity for the thinking preference with a rating of 88%. As a manager in he military profession, pride myself on my ability to be objective, fair and firm. As a supervisor I frequently make difficult decisions and firmly believe that it is more important to be respected than liked. Always try to look at things from a logical perspective and try not to let my personal feelings get in the way of my decisions. One down side with the thinking preference is that it is possible to forget about the people perspective when you are making decisions (â€Å"Psychological Type†, 2014). Judging Preference The judging preference was my most definitive personality preference with rating of 100% on the Jung Typology Test. In my military profession I live by a schedule, make decisive judgments, and always try to follow the established rules and regulations. Onto like to wait until the last minute to do things. I am also very conservative and regulated in my approach to my personal and professional life. One weakness of my overwhelmingly strong judging preference is that frequently have little patience with people that are procrastinators, poor planners, or unable to make decisions. SITS Personality with a SO Temperament People with SITS personalities are considered internally focused individuals ho exhibit; strong senses of duty, good organizational skills, are driven to succeed, are honest, and value their integrity (â€Å"Psychological Type†, 2014).My temperament is a Sensing Judging (SO). SO temperaments desire to be associated with significant institutions or organizations (Kroger, Teethes, & Rutledge, 2002). As a Non-commissioned Officer in the united States Air Force this makes perfect sense. I enjoy the daily challenges associated with being an administrator and manager. I have a deep respect for the chain of command within my organization, and pride myself on being reliable. A active byproduct is that in my personal life my SO temperament can sometimes be overwhelming for my children because I tend to be a task master.Relating Personality Types to Organizations After reading Type Talk at Work, I have a greater knowledge of the 16 different personality types and how they relate to organizational behavior. As a manager in an organization, it is essential that I am able to calculate the internal strengths and weaknesses of my employees (Fisher, 2012). Understanding how to analyze an individual based on their personality type can be of enormous benefit to me as a super visor. Throughout my years as an enlisted manager in the IIS Air Force, I have learned that each individual is different and you have to manage them accordingly.For example; if I have to assign someone as training instructor, probably would look for an extrovert over an introvert. Since having someone who is comfortable speaking in front of people would be vital for this position, an extrovert personality would be a better choice. Motivation is also different based on personality. Extroverts enjoy being rewarded in public, while introverts might prefer a more low key setting. As a manager it is also important for me to understand how my own personality type effects my management style.As a SITS personality type, occasionally have a tendency to dismiss the perspectives of others. I also am a very â€Å"by the book† manager. Understanding the weaker characteristics of my personality type will help me to control them so they don't corrupt my ability to manage my organization (â €Å"Psychological Type†, 2014). Reading and learning about the 16 different personality types has been very enlightening from a personal and professional perspective. Understanding he four different personality preferences and how they work together to make up my personality will benefit me throughout my life.

What Are Human Rights - 1966 Words

What are human rights? Human rights are the fundamental rights and freedoms that belong to all people. They belong to every single one of us and they are universal, inalienable, indivisible and interdependent. The evolution of human rights goes back to that of the Enlightenment. One of the first published and signed documentations of human rights around the world were the United States and French Declarations of Independence. Throughout history there have been many leaps in the pursuit of equal human rights across the world, but there have also been many setbacks. Although Canada is one of the most equal, accepting and free countries in the world, things have not always been that way. Canadian government has created many†¦show more content†¦The Charter was founded around the basic rules and laws of the Constitution of Canada, and is based around basic and fundamental freedoms, such as; democratic rights, mobility rights, legal rights, minority rights and equality rights. It also recognizes the multicultural and diverse side of Canada. The Charter is valuable and prominent in society, even today. It keeps respect between the Government of Canada and the individuals living in it. In order for a right to be put in place, it must be recognized the the givernment and citizens of Canada. This keeps individuals in Canada from creating new rights when they are in need of them. This keeps the law from being overrun by human rights. A basic human right is based not only on law, but on morals. It’s based around how two people should treat each other without question. The charter gives its rights to all citizens and newcomers, though some only apply to citizens, like the right to vote and the right to enter and leave the country whenever one desires. Human rights are continuously moving in a cycle to benefit different groups, and that is where the evolution begins. Rights in Canada evolved from just prohibiting certain acts to uncovering injustices and dem anding equality. Before the human rights action really got started, many Canadians struggled with the injustices being made to the people of their gender, race or religion. Without the help of the Charter they had no

Science Clipart Diagrams

The World Of Color, By Theu.s Marshals - 1784 Words

The U.S Marshals They’re faceless, while protecting her but they also box her in. The depiction of the guards, visually frame her and defines her space, just as they do conceptually. Conceptually, the American society consists of a multitude of advantages that are viewed as â€Å"the way it is†, unconsciously, oppressing the minorities in ways consisting in areas of opportunity: education, housing and jobs. Society has a subtle way of selling the â€Å"American Dream†: getting a chance so unique, that it only exists in a single country. Dreams are not limited; freedom, success, opportunity, perseverance, equality, justice, and safety for all. Growing up, in the world of color, it is extremely rare to exceed the social barrier when it comes to†¦show more content†¦My mother on the other hand, received her bachelors (equivalent to associate degree) from the University of Guyana in teacher education. Nobody, like my grandmother was advocate for higher education. She always say in her little accent â€Å"Gyal, there ain’t nothing like dem books!† The public education availability in the United States, in my family eyes was a way to achieve your goals in life. But, my parents were very transparent of how hard it would be for someone with color of my skin. As a little girl, my family tried in any way they could to shelter us from all the prejudices of the world. They taught me to set my limits beyond the moon, surpass the sun, because there was no abolishment in learning, in accumulating as much knowledge as one can get. But, they also instilled that whatever I wanted in life I would have to earn it and it wasn t going to be easy; I would have to fight the battle, and rise above the standards that were branded upon me. The stereotypical views that are associated with being from Brooklyn are linked to aspects of poverty. People who live in poverty rarely have ways of getting what they need done; or they become reliant on government handouts, drug dealers on almost every corner, crimes or any other stereotypical images that are depicted in Spike

The Air Traffic Controllers Strike of 1981 Free Essays

In this study, I intend to provide an overview of the air traffic controllers’ strike that occurred in 1981. This strike came at the peak of increased tension between the air traffic controllers union, PATCO, and the FAA, a federal agency charged with overseeing the management of all civil air flights. The strike occurred on August 3, 1981. We will write a custom essay sample on The Air Traffic Controllers Strike of 1981 or any similar topic only for you Order Now On that day, approximately 12,000 air traffic controllers went on strike, effectively crippling the civil air industry. As members of PATCO, these individuals certainly felt they had the right to strike; however, under the terms of certain laws affecting federal employees, the air traffic controllers, in fact, did not have this right. As a result, President Reagan immediately threatened that any air traffic controller not back at work within 48 hours of the start of the strike would lost his or her job. Three days later, the FAA issued 12,000 dismissal notices and the strike officially came to an end (Spector, 1982, p. ). Of particular interest to me is not only the details and particulars of this strike, but also the structural circumstances that precipitated it and why compensation negotiations were ineffectual. Therefore, I will focus the remainder of this overview on several key points: the internal and external environmental forces that led to the strike, specific human resources issues that made air traffic controllers apt to strike, and a review of the negotiation process and the failed proposals on both sides. In the course of this evaluation, I will discuss some of the major players in the strike, analyze some of the fundamental causes of this strike, and even present at least one alternative solution that was proposed at the time and should have probably been implemented without fail. In this, I intend to illustrate the nature of the air traffic controllers’ strike of 1981 and the factors that made it all but inevitable. To begin with, let’s consider some of the major players who were involved in the air traffic controllers’ strike. First, there is the FAA. This is the federal agency that was established in 1958 to manage all civilian air flights in the United States. At the time of the strike, all air traffic controllers in the United States were trained, certified, and employed by the FAA (Spector, 1982, p. 1). In other words, the FAA had a literal stranglehold on the market for air traffic controllers in the United States. To work in the United States as an air traffic controller, thus, meant that one had to work with the FAA and abide by their prescriptions for how air traffic controllers should be employed. Second, we should consider PATCO, or the Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization. This group was affiliated with the AFL-CIO and was created in 1968. It was, in short, a union of air traffic controllers. During the 1970s, in particular, PATCO grew at a tremendous rate (Spector, 1982, p. 2). By the time the potential strike rolled around, most of the air traffic controllers in the United States were members of PATCO. Third, we should consider the head of PATCO, the man who lead the organization down the more militant path towards strike and whose ultimate negotiations with the FAA would precipitate the strike in the first place. Robert Poll took the reins at PATCO in 1980, partially in response to attitudes within the organization that felt a more aggressive stance was needed towards the FAA on the part of unionized air traffic controllers (Spector, 1982, p. 2). In this context, we can see that Poll and PATCO were immediately at odds with the FAA, which as an organization naturally wanted to maintain its monopolistic control over the supply of air traffic controllers. The conflict between the two primary players in this strike-the FAA and PATCO-was only exasperated by certain pieces of federal legislation that prohibited federal employees from using strikes, sit-ins, or work slow downs to affect changes in their employment status. Legislation such as the Federal Relations Labor act prevented federal unionized employees to use their union status for anything other than collective bargaining (Spector, 1982, p. 2). This structural component of the issue further tied the figurative hands of PATCO and the air traffic controllers. It may even have precipitated a strike if the air traffic controllers felt cornered and desperate in their dealings with the FAA. If the air traffic controllers did not think there was any possibility of seeing their demands met-and how could they, if they were not permitted to use the threat of a strike? -then it is possible that they would have instigated the strike in desperation. There were a number of other issues that certainly led to a strike-style conflict between the FAA and PATCO. For example, of the 17,275 air traffic controllers employed in July 1981, all had to take part in a seventeen-week training course and then participate in on-the-job training for an additional two to four years. The FAA estimated that the total cost of training an air traffic controller amounted to $175,000 (Spector, 1982, p. 4). From the perspective of the FAA, labor negotiations were unlikely to result in higher pay rates or other forms of compensation. From the federal perspective, a significant amount of money had already been invested in these individuals; more was not a viable option. For the air traffic controllers, however, increased pay was the least of their concerns. As air traffic controllers knew all too well, the job of managing dozens of aircraft from the ground simultaneously was not easy. When PATCO went to the negotiation table with the FAA prior to the strike, they listed a number of concerns and problems that they wanted to see corrected. These included, but were not limited to, the following. One, PATCO was concerned about access. The FAA gave unfettered access to airports at any time, to anyone. The result was extremes of traffic during peak and off hours of the day or week. PATCO also cited poor supervision from individuals who were often paid more than the air traffic controllers to do nothing more than shift paperwork around. Safety responsibility was also a concern-given the demands of the job and the life-or-death nature of it, some air traffic controllers felt that there should be a better system of managing and accepting responsibility. Finally, the air traffic controllers were concerned about their pay scale, especially lost overtime hours according to federal mandate (Spector, 1982, p. 10-11). Salaries for air traffic controllers were reasonable for the period, however some federal regulations placed a cap on the amount that any individual could earn as a federal employee. Additionally, limitations were made regarding the amount of pay that could be awarded during any two week period, regardless of hours worked. This fact, combined with the extremely stressful nature of the job, upset many at PATCO (Spector, 1982, p. 4,6). The fact that the FAA rated as one of the poorest employers of air traffic controllers worldwide in terms of hours worked per week, vacation days, and sick leave only made matters worse (Spector, 1982, p. 5). Thus, when the FAA and PATCO went to the negotiation table in the days and weeks preceding the strike on August 3, there were a number of issues that had to be resolved between them. The air traffic controllers felt overworked, overstressed, and under appreciated in general. The FAA felt that it had the upper hand because the air traffic controllers were unable, by federal law, to go on strike. For this reason, the eventual strike-in hindsight-seems all but inevitable. In fact, the assumption that the FAA had the upper hand in the negotiations may have led directly to their counter offer which was much more conservative than the original PATCO demands. PATCO wanted an increase in salaries, a new maximum salary limit, a reduction in the work week, earlier retirement benefits, and cost of living adjustments to be made twice a year. The FAA negotiator, John Helms, estimated that this package would cost the government around $744 million the first year. He countered with a proposal that would only cost $40 million the first year, but which was a significantly watered down version of PATCO demands (Spector, 1982, p. 10). The union rejected this offer and went back to the negotiation table. When the second counter offer from the FAA was also not to their liking, they voted 95% in favor of going on strike (Spector, 1982, p. 11). The consequent strike on August 3, 1981 cost most of PATCO members their jobs and ended up costing the aviation industry, as well as associated industries such as tourism and hotels, millions of dollars in lost profits. Given these myriad environmental forces, symptoms and causes, and the inherent conflict between the FAA and PATCO, it is little wonder that a strike was the ultimate result between the negotiations between the FAA and PATCO. But what might have been done differently, what other solution might have worked in the past to alleviate the problems that occurred? For an answer I turn to Lane Kirkland of the AFL-CIO who said at the time, â€Å"The air traffic control system is a purely subsidized service the government is providing for the private airline industry. Under the Reagan doctrine of getting the government off people’s backs, you’d think they might try to turn the whole thing over to the industry to run instead of using the might and majesty of the government to suppress a strike† (Spector, 1982, p. 4). In fact, this is exactly the solution that I would have suggested at the time and would advocate today as a solution to the mess that the FAA found itself in in 1981. If the FAA had been privatized, the concerns and issues that air traffic controllers were having could have been easily resolved between PATCO and the airline industry, in whose best interest it would have been to resolve the matter to keep planes in the air and profits in the black. Instead, the government used an ineffective law to force almost 12,000 people out of work who were simply trying to use the power of the strike to leverage themselves better working conditions. Especially when we consider the magnitude of the job that air traffic controllers did (and do) and the safety of countless lives that could have been at stake, it is even amazing that the government responded to the legitimate concerns of air traffic controllers in the way that it did. How to cite The Air Traffic Controllers Strike of 1981, Essay examples

Ethnocentrism And Cultural Relativism Sample Essay Example For Students

Ethnocentrism And Cultural Relativism Sample Essay Ethnocentrism and Cultural Relativism Ethnocentrism and Cultural Relativism are opposing but still complimentary forces in today’s universe. They are the cause of many wars and yet the captivation of travel. trade and commercialism. The subjects can be defined as: eth†?no†?cen†?trism ( ethn sentriz m ) . N. 1. the belief in the built-in high quality of one’s ain cultural group or civilization. 2. a inclination to see foreign groups or civilizations from the position of one’s ain. ethno†?centric. adj. ethno†?centri†?cal†?ly. adv. Cultural Relativism does non look to hold a definition listed in a dictionary nevertheless it is the pattern of accepting the civilizations of different people throughout the universe non needfully separated by geographics. Probably the most recent and blazing illustration of ethnocentrism was Milosevic’s effort at cultural cleaning of Kosovo. However this is by no means the worst instance. Unfortunately ethnocentrism is the cause of many wars. Ironically the US was labeled as the Cultural Relativism that countered Milosevic’s ethnocentrism. The US is non wholly guiltless of the ethnocentrism in position of the Indian wars or the US civil war. The US has been guilty of both reculturization of the native Americans in seeking to coerce them to larn and populate the white European ways and race murder in the wars and isolation. It appears that Milosevic was merely concerned with race murder as Hitler was. In Asia it appears that China and North Korea are practising ethnocentrism but non in an open manner as in Serbia. Rather China and North Korea pattern it in non opening up to outside states. In this manner they are stating that they evidently don’t want their civilizations infected b y any others. Although these utmost and open illustrations may look to be negative to some people. they are illustrations of the desire responsible for the alone qualities of the assorted civilizations. It is the alone qualities of the assorted civilizations that excite us as people to desire to go and see the differences in other life manners. The alone civilizations produce a diverseness of life manners that finally enhance worlds to accommodate to assorted environments. Merely by esteeming and appreciating each others civilizations will we be able to continue them for subsequent coevalss to bask and larn from. This brings us to Cultural Relativism. The pattern of accepting the assorted civilizations of the universe for what they are and appreciating what they have to offer. The United States is likely the best illustration of this. Although the US has had it’s periods of ethnocentrism. it is now diverse in its civilizations. There are groups of people in the US who live largely the manner of some â€Å"motherland† . Not merely are at that place groups that are identified with Asia. Europe. and Africa merely to advert a few. but there are assorted versions of each of them. For case Asia can be divided into East and West. so from the East. China. Korea. and Japan. The list could cover several pages. The point is that these groups of people enjoy cultural life styles that have dominated their heritage for coevalss. The comparative benefit of this is a diverse state that accepts and appreciates many life manners. There is a inquiry as to where to pull the line between continuing and changing civilizations. Some civilizations have patterns that are considered to be human rights misdemeanors by others. Such things as female Circumcision and honor violent deaths. Again these are utmost illustrations but the point is that some human rights militants would hold these patterns outlawed worldwide while some anthropologists choose to continue the civilizations as they are. When outside beginnings force alteration on a civilization pattern. where does it halt? In decision it is a degree of ethnocentrism that keeps the universe we live in diverse and interesting to those us who like to go and research. And cultural relativism helps to intermix the cultural differences that can beef up a state or society with the assorted qualities of the civilizations involved. .u0539d6d57c27074c999afa7b8fc92fa4 , .u0539d6d57c27074c999afa7b8fc92fa4 .postImageUrl , .u0539d6d57c27074c999afa7b8fc92fa4 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u0539d6d57c27074c999afa7b8fc92fa4 , .u0539d6d57c27074c999afa7b8fc92fa4:hover , .u0539d6d57c27074c999afa7b8fc92fa4:visited , .u0539d6d57c27074c999afa7b8fc92fa4:active { border:0!important; } .u0539d6d57c27074c999afa7b8fc92fa4 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u0539d6d57c27074c999afa7b8fc92fa4 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u0539d6d57c27074c999afa7b8fc92fa4:active , .u0539d6d57c27074c999afa7b8fc92fa4:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u0539d6d57c27074c999afa7b8fc92fa4 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative; } .u0539d6d57c27074c999afa7b8fc92fa4 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; p adding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u0539d6d57c27074c999afa7b8fc92fa4 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u0539d6d57c27074c999afa7b8fc92fa4 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u0539d6d57c27074c999afa7b8fc92fa4:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u0539d6d57c27074c999afa7b8fc92fa4 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left: 18px; top: 0; } .u0539d6d57c27074c999afa7b8fc92fa4 .u0539d6d57c27074c999afa7b8fc92fa4-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; p adding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u0539d6d57c27074c999afa7b8fc92fa4:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: The Safety Inspector Essay